Does it take vision to understand that in mind, the views and understanding of men -- in short, human consciousness -- changes with every change in the conditions of his material life, in social relations and in his social life? What else is evidenced by the history of thought, except that the changing nature of his intellectual production equal to the production of material things that have changed? The thoughts that dominate in each era is always the thoughts of the ruling class.
When people talk about the thoughts that revolutionize the society, it is nothing but express the fact, that within the old society, the elements of a new society has been created, and that the melting of old thoughts are running with the same steps with the melting of old life terms.
However the shape, the reality is the same for all times in the distant past, namely, the exploitation of the people by a majority of the other part. So it is not surprising that the social consciousness of past ages, and even if there is a whole spectrum of shades, engaged in certain forms of the same, or general ideas, which can not be lost entirely except with the disappearance at all the class antagonisms.
If in the course of development, the class distinctions have disappeared, and all production has been concentrated into the hands of a vast association of the whole nation, public power will lose its political character. Political power, in the proper sense of the word, only the organized power of one class for oppressing another class. If the proletariat during its struggle against the bourgeoisie is forced, because of the pressure of circumstances, to organize itself as a class, if, by way of revolution, it makes itself the ruling class, and, as the ruling class, eliminating the violent relations of production that long, so it, together with these terms will eliminate the conditions for the existence of class antagonisms and the existence of classes generally, and will thereby eliminating its own power as a class.
And as a replacement of the old bourgeois society with its classes along with class antagonisms, we will have a community life in which the free development of each person becomes a condition for the free development of all.
***
[CZ-lacalifusa 021514/to you, dahling]
What is this, Cisca? Please give an explanation, because it is not much better than saying you love him.Is this your kind of love letter to him, hm?■ Manifesto of the Communist Party || ■ The Communist Manifesto
■ The Transitional Program || ■ Winning Support For Socialism || ■ New introduction to The Transitional Programme
Oops, sorry, ... it's like to show you my favorite food menus on the table and now you're looking at me with disgust, maybe? Ehhehe... yups! Yups, sometimes my fiance is a fucking guy! Dahling, you're the Bedbugs! And I am a nerd! Actually a pair of nerds never love each other, you know?...... Why did he look at me deeply as if I was a sufferer of malnutrition after we had sex? "Eyes of a Liberal", he said.
What? ... ... Blah! ...
■ Who Paid the Piper?: CIA and the Cultural Cold War
■ The CIA and the Cultural Cold War Revisited
■ The Congress for Cultural Freedom: Making the Postwar World Safe for Fascist 'Kulturkampf'■ Cranky Intergrity on the left
■ The New York Intellectuals and the invention of neoconservatism
■ The New Leader
■ Dewey's Aesthetics
■ Dewey's Political Philosophy
■ Towards the Understanding of Karl Marx: A Revolutionary Interpretation
■ Lionel Trilling's Life of the Mind
■ Behind the Moscow Trial
■ October 25, 1917 : The Bolshevik party combined with the soviets of the major cities of Russia toppled the Provisional Government.
■ Arthur Koestler and Ignazio Silone
■ Featured Author: Arthur Koestler - With News and Reviews From the Archives of The NY Times
■ Croce's Aesthetics
■ Karl Jaspers
■ Jacques Maritain
■ Darkness at Noon
■ James Burnham and the Struggle for the World: A Life
■ George Orwell : Second Thoughts on James Burnham
■ The Secret Life Of Ignazio Silone
■ The Cultural Cold War - The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters | By Frances Stonor Saunders
■ La révolution prolétarienne et le rénégat Kautsky
■ Nicola Chiaromonte and the Theatre - Mary McCarthy
No comments:
Post a Comment