S Y R I A
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad insists he is ready to face foreign intervention and will not provide tolerance for anti-government protesters in his country.
Assad's assertion is contrary to the Arab League's call to end the unrest. Assad insisted his government would not bow to the international pressure that criticize the way his government to deal with demonstrators. "I'm ready to continue to fight and die for Syria if this country will eventually have to face the foreign intervention," he said. According to Assad, the conflict will continue and the international pressure will continue to conquer Syria.
In addition, Assad also accused the Arab League were creating the path for Western military intervention to Syria. Assad warned that foreign intervention would create an "earthquake" in the whole of the Middle East. "If the West think it logically, rationally, and realistically, they do not do it. The military invasion will only add the instability throughout the region which will consequently affect all the countries, "said Assad as quoted by the BBC. Actually, the deadline given by the Arab League to the Syrian government to accept the peace plan proposed by the organization has ended.
Earlier the Syrian government declared in principle to accept the Arab League proposal, but some observers suspected this statement was simply a delaying tactic. According to Assad, the only way to create the peace in Syria is to hunt down the armed groups, to prevent the entry of weapons from neighboring countries, to prevent sabotage, and to enforce the law. If everything can be realized, then he ensures that Syria will calm and peaceful.
Assad asserted, he was deeply concerned over any Syrian people's blood which has been spilled. He ensured that his army would remain pursuit of the group called by him as a rebel gang. "It is my job as president. My current daily obligation is to stop the bloodshed caused by groups of armed terrorists who attacked several areas, "he said. The Syrian government also offered the reform. Assad asserted that in February or March next year would be held the elections to choose the members of parliament. The lawmakers will form a new constitution and prepare the presidential election. The constitution will determine how the presidential election, or whether the president is still needed or not.
I see the situation in Syria is like a woman who is pregnant and about to give birth. Please, do not disturb a pregnant woman. That is very inhumane! Let Syria overcome its own problems. At least, wait until the election takes place and see the results.
Assad has said that he would not defend a stubborn government, but no one of the leaders who likes his supremacy is disturbed. Are you a leader? Ask yourself, what and how you will react if you are in such a situation experienced by Assad. Regarding the desire to retain the power, it is the most instinctive of every leader. (Darling, do you think Barack Obama, for example, will have no interest to follow the U.S election in 2012, hm...?)
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad insists he is ready to face foreign intervention and will not provide tolerance for anti-government protesters in his country.
Assad's assertion is contrary to the Arab League's call to end the unrest. Assad insisted his government would not bow to the international pressure that criticize the way his government to deal with demonstrators. "I'm ready to continue to fight and die for Syria if this country will eventually have to face the foreign intervention," he said. According to Assad, the conflict will continue and the international pressure will continue to conquer Syria.
In addition, Assad also accused the Arab League were creating the path for Western military intervention to Syria. Assad warned that foreign intervention would create an "earthquake" in the whole of the Middle East. "If the West think it logically, rationally, and realistically, they do not do it. The military invasion will only add the instability throughout the region which will consequently affect all the countries, "said Assad as quoted by the BBC. Actually, the deadline given by the Arab League to the Syrian government to accept the peace plan proposed by the organization has ended.
Earlier the Syrian government declared in principle to accept the Arab League proposal, but some observers suspected this statement was simply a delaying tactic. According to Assad, the only way to create the peace in Syria is to hunt down the armed groups, to prevent the entry of weapons from neighboring countries, to prevent sabotage, and to enforce the law. If everything can be realized, then he ensures that Syria will calm and peaceful.
Assad asserted, he was deeply concerned over any Syrian people's blood which has been spilled. He ensured that his army would remain pursuit of the group called by him as a rebel gang. "It is my job as president. My current daily obligation is to stop the bloodshed caused by groups of armed terrorists who attacked several areas, "he said. The Syrian government also offered the reform. Assad asserted that in February or March next year would be held the elections to choose the members of parliament. The lawmakers will form a new constitution and prepare the presidential election. The constitution will determine how the presidential election, or whether the president is still needed or not.
I see the situation in Syria is like a woman who is pregnant and about to give birth. Please, do not disturb a pregnant woman. That is very inhumane! Let Syria overcome its own problems. At least, wait until the election takes place and see the results.
Assad has said that he would not defend a stubborn government, but no one of the leaders who likes his supremacy is disturbed. Are you a leader? Ask yourself, what and how you will react if you are in such a situation experienced by Assad. Regarding the desire to retain the power, it is the most instinctive of every leader. (Darling, do you think Barack Obama, for example, will have no interest to follow the U.S election in 2012, hm...?)
L I B Y A
► http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8905151/Libyan-officials-will-seek-death-penalty-for-Saif-al-Islam-Gaddafi.html
Libyan officials will seek death penalty for Saif al-Islam Gaddafi - Telegraph
Libyan officials have made it clear they will seek the death penalty for Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, as the former dictator's son demanded a lawyer on Monday.
Here is an example of an intolerance character. When they cried out for help of the international aid, until then the United Nations sent NATO to Libya for securing the civilians (and which in the end of the mission was also aimed to kill Gaddafi) they did not say their struggle was a national struggle. (Of course, cause you know who you are!). But when they deal with all matters relating to Gaddafi, as well as his sons, his loyal followers (although they should pursue them to the rat hole), and they have captured them and tried to prosecute by law, they have no shame to say, "This is the national sovereignty of Libya." (Ehehehee...funny! funny! stupid! sucks! sickening!Eh Libya, before the Gaddafi's death, you shouted, screaming in fear, in panic, making the ICC finally issued a statement that Saif was its fugitive. It means he is owned by the ICC. So, once he was caught, then you should give him to the ICC. If you want to try him in Libya, you must make a written request, and the ICC will decide the application. So stop acting like a blind man which just able to look at things and proudly (precisely: no shame!) said, "This is our national sovereignty ".... ehhehehee ...
)
You have already appeared as a new regime that use the violence to fight for your goals, so you do not make any differences with the previous regime. See how the militia members in Zintan, they have not handed Saif and Sanusi yet to the Tripoli government, because they want to make sure that they will get a share of positions in the new government of Libya. Aww, look at their behavior!
Perhaps these two men (Saif and Sanusi) will be put to death as well (Yeah, because a murderer just love to kill only), but before they die, the people of this new regime make them such as the contest with prizes for their ambitions and personal interests. (Life is naturally cruel indeed. The formula is: who is stronger, then he will live. Among the animals, humans are the most cruel, because they eat everything. If the tiger pounce on man until the man dies, people call the tiger as a wild animal. But if the man shoot the tiger until the tiger is dead, the man is not said to be a wild animal.
The goats eat the plants, but the plants do not eat the goat. The Tiger eats the goat, and the man: eat them all! Plants, goats, and tigers. But the man is not said to be wild, because the reason is ethical: the animal meat is not eaten raw. The tiger, the goat and the plant are eaten after they are cooked with some spices.
In fact, if people want to be honest, people really are the wild animals. But because people have a sense, then the sense is often used for cheating.)
What about Gaddafi followers who were detained without charge? Have they been released, hm? So, you don't need too much talking about the law and human rights. Stop clowning! Do not you realize that the enforcement of human rights also apply to person who you think is the most evil though? All persons, before the judge decides the verdict then that person has the right to be heard his/her testimony in court and he/she is innocent until he/she is proven guilty." Yes. And what do you do? Even before any court, you've threatened to impose the death penalty to them, whereas you have not heard the testimony/their defense at all. Come on, do not mince words to wash hands and pray before eating, if what you really want is to swallow the dining table in a flash!
The whole world already knows that the new Libyan regime is the Gaddafi's killer and the action is classified as violations of human rights. So, how could it be, a human rights violator is lecturing about the human rights? Who teaches you to do so?
*****
Son of Moammar Gaddafi, Saif al-Islam, sits in between the transitional government soldiers who arrested him in the Libyan city of Obari, southern Libya, Saturday (19 Novembre 2011). Photo: REUTERS/Handout
Look at that! The Libya's children were holding the guns. Is that a real gun? I do not know where the weapons were obtained, and how can they use it freely? What kind of security model be applied by Libya? Which legal system that was promised to be fair, transparent and all the words uttered just polishing those lips? Even to regulate the circulation of weapons, they are not incompetent at all!
► http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8905151/Libyan-officials-will-seek-death-penalty-for-Saif-al-Islam-Gaddafi.html
Libyan officials will seek death penalty for Saif al-Islam Gaddafi - Telegraph
Libyan officials have made it clear they will seek the death penalty for Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, as the former dictator's son demanded a lawyer on Monday.
Here is an example of an intolerance character. When they cried out for help of the international aid, until then the United Nations sent NATO to Libya for securing the civilians (and which in the end of the mission was also aimed to kill Gaddafi) they did not say their struggle was a national struggle. (Of course, cause you know who you are!). But when they deal with all matters relating to Gaddafi, as well as his sons, his loyal followers (although they should pursue them to the rat hole), and they have captured them and tried to prosecute by law, they have no shame to say, "This is the national sovereignty of Libya." (Ehehehee...funny! funny! stupid! sucks! sickening!Eh Libya, before the Gaddafi's death, you shouted, screaming in fear, in panic, making the ICC finally issued a statement that Saif was its fugitive. It means he is owned by the ICC. So, once he was caught, then you should give him to the ICC. If you want to try him in Libya, you must make a written request, and the ICC will decide the application. So stop acting like a blind man which just able to look at things and proudly (precisely: no shame!) said, "This is our national sovereignty ".... ehhehehee ...
)You have already appeared as a new regime that use the violence to fight for your goals, so you do not make any differences with the previous regime. See how the militia members in Zintan, they have not handed Saif and Sanusi yet to the Tripoli government, because they want to make sure that they will get a share of positions in the new government of Libya. Aww, look at their behavior!
Perhaps these two men (Saif and Sanusi) will be put to death as well (Yeah, because a murderer just love to kill only), but before they die, the people of this new regime make them such as the contest with prizes for their ambitions and personal interests. (Life is naturally cruel indeed. The formula is: who is stronger, then he will live. Among the animals, humans are the most cruel, because they eat everything. If the tiger pounce on man until the man dies, people call the tiger as a wild animal. But if the man shoot the tiger until the tiger is dead, the man is not said to be a wild animal.
The goats eat the plants, but the plants do not eat the goat. The Tiger eats the goat, and the man: eat them all! Plants, goats, and tigers. But the man is not said to be wild, because the reason is ethical: the animal meat is not eaten raw. The tiger, the goat and the plant are eaten after they are cooked with some spices.
In fact, if people want to be honest, people really are the wild animals. But because people have a sense, then the sense is often used for cheating.)
What about Gaddafi followers who were detained without charge? Have they been released, hm? So, you don't need too much talking about the law and human rights. Stop clowning! Do not you realize that the enforcement of human rights also apply to person who you think is the most evil though? All persons, before the judge decides the verdict then that person has the right to be heard his/her testimony in court and he/she is innocent until he/she is proven guilty." Yes. And what do you do? Even before any court, you've threatened to impose the death penalty to them, whereas you have not heard the testimony/their defense at all. Come on, do not mince words to wash hands and pray before eating, if what you really want is to swallow the dining table in a flash!
The whole world already knows that the new Libyan regime is the Gaddafi's killer and the action is classified as violations of human rights. So, how could it be, a human rights violator is lecturing about the human rights? Who teaches you to do so?
*****
Saif al-Islam, sits in an undisclosed location on Saturday (11/19/2011). Photo: REUTERS/Libya Free TV via Reuters TV
Aura of this face has suffered greatly. Apathetic.
Saif al-Islam spoke to reporters in Tripoli, Libya, August 23, 2011. Photo: REUTERS/Paul Hackett/Files
Look at that! The Libya's children were holding the guns. Is that a real gun? I do not know where the weapons were obtained, and how can they use it freely? What kind of security model be applied by Libya? Which legal system that was promised to be fair, transparent and all the words uttered just polishing those lips? Even to regulate the circulation of weapons, they are not incompetent at all!
E G Y P T
Welcome to the second round of the revolution. More and more people will die, then the world's population will decrease, and this will conserve the energy source on earth. Yesyesyes, rather die than live as useless eaters!(Ouch! I do not know where, but it seems I've heard or read this statement before. Maybe in the 90's, arghh... more or less so. Hmmm. I kinda forget.)
Now I know I'm so stupid to distinguish between the democratic and anarchist, because I do not understand why in order to obtain the goal which is said to be the result of democracy then the people have to apply anarchist? Is there no more democratic way to achieve a democratic outcome? Why do not people use the democratic means and peaceful in conveying their aspirations? Why is the people's movements in the Middle East so easy to do violence and easily lured by the enticements, by provocation, by the pressure to want to use violent means?
*****
Welcome to the second round of the revolution. More and more people will die, then the world's population will decrease, and this will conserve the energy source on earth. Yesyesyes, rather die than live as useless eaters!(Ouch! I do not know where, but it seems I've heard or read this statement before. Maybe in the 90's, arghh... more or less so. Hmmm. I kinda forget.)
Now I know I'm so stupid to distinguish between the democratic and anarchist, because I do not understand why in order to obtain the goal which is said to be the result of democracy then the people have to apply anarchist? Is there no more democratic way to achieve a democratic outcome? Why do not people use the democratic means and peaceful in conveying their aspirations? Why is the people's movements in the Middle East so easy to do violence and easily lured by the enticements, by provocation, by the pressure to want to use violent means?
*****
We Are in This Week
My partner said, "Honey, I don't feel she's pretty. Why is her nose so big?"
I asked, "Who?"
My partner said, "Honey, I don't feel she's pretty. Why is her nose so big?"
I asked, "Who?"
Bernard Henry Levy
► http://www.bernard-henri-levy.com/en/category/actu
Bernard-Henri Lévy > Breaking news
Retrouvez toute l’actualité de BHL.
(Eh, gosh, dahliiiing..., Miss Piggy and Kermit. Ouch, what the heck? ehhhee ... Why do they also go along here? I've been following your willingness to be funny, but...they do not seem to take part with this news, ehheee ... but, yayaya, it's okay. Don't take it personally. I just want to say I'm happy with you.)
No comments:
Post a Comment